I'm happy someone's challenging the Rails almost-monoculture in the Ruby ecosystem, but Hanami doesn't seem to bring much to the table. Is there anything in this release that Rails hasn't had for years?

▲

itsdesmond 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What Hanami brings is an intentional and well-reasoned architecture that supports building maintainable applications. It has taste.

▲

choilive 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That statement means nothing. You could say the exact same thing about Rails and have an equally defensible position. What about its architecture makes it better?

▲

itsdesmond 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You could not.

	▲	throwatdem12311 38 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		“Nuh uh” Isn’t a good rebuttal. How about some examples comparing where a solution in Hanami is “tasteful” while the same solution in Rails is “not tasteful”?

▲

jatora 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What? This doesnt mean anything

	▲	itsdesmond 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This says more bout you than me.

▲

neko_ranger 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's basically the flask/fastapi but for ruby, compared to django/rails. It has it's purpose if you want to stay in ruby land

	▲	PuercoPop an hour ago \| parent [-]
		It is not, Hanami is a batteries-included framework. It not even a pay-as-you-go framework like Pyramid. The equivalent of Flask in Ruby land is Roda+Sequel.