Yeah, I also got suspicious and checked it with Pangram. Sadly 100% AI. Perhaps it still has good points, but my heart drops whenever I sniff the AI prose. I can just query Claude or ChatGPT myself, you know?

▲

satvikpendem an hour ago | parent [-]

AI detectors are notoriously bad at actually detecting AI. I would not take those things at face value at all.

	▲	Sol- an hour ago \| parent [-]
		That was my impression in the past as well, but by all accounts pangram works well, at least at the moment. It also seems quite plausible that it can be made to work by training on a lot of model output. Most of us already have become very sensitive to the various idiosyncrasies of model writing, after all. They have a very distinctive style.