| ▲ | TomasBM 7 hours ago | |
I think that's completely fair. There are also plenty of valid personal reasons for refusing to generate code with AI - learning-by-doing and ownership of the result being the main ones, IMO. > everybody wants to let AI do their work for them, but nobody wants to be downstream of AI work. This is also true in my experience. But in my work, I found that I don't care how the code or comment was generated, as long as it doesn't try to overload my brain with irrelevant and obfuscated things, and as long as the person is not pretending that it's true, verified or their own creation (when it isn't). | ||
| ▲ | Forgeties79 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |
>as long as it doesn't try to overload my brain with irrelevant and obfuscated things, and as long as the person is not pretending that it's true, verified or their own creation (when it isn't). Agreed, but my main point is most people continue to do exactly this and simply won’t stop. They think “AI took care of it and it’s good enough” then essentially shove their work on to the recipient 30% completed. So long as that’s the way most people use LLM’s we will continue to see restrictions put in place by the recipients. | ||