No, reviewing PRs in general is a delightful process. The tedious part is in the initial triage when the PR comes from a previously unknown submitter, and you cannot be sure what is the intention of the submitter, what is their technical level, whether they are talking out of their ass or not.

It's basically the same issue as spam in emails. It was bad before, and automation made it a zillion times worse.

> No, reviewing PRs in general is a delightful process

I don't know if this is a very universal feeling. I personally find reviewing code is tedious compared to writing it

Not just the process of reading the code and understanding it, but the back and forth can be miserable if the submitter isn't meeting you part way

I dunno. Maybe I'm the odd one out for thinking reviewing PRs is more of a chore than a joy