| ▲ | someonebaggy 8 hours ago | |
There's no chance that anyone saw that far ahead in the future and planned it. It's emergent behaviour. | ||
| ▲ | x3ro 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Who says anything about „this far in the future“? It’s enough for Anthropic et al to realize this one or two model versions ago, see it as a strategic advantage and push for that behavior. | ||
| ▲ | jayd16 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Big tech: "Should we add any functionality at all to filter AI slop in any of our platforms?" "...nah" Its not 500 moves ahead. | ||
| ▲ | Yizahi 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
While it certainly didn't enter a mind of any director making decisions (because they can't comprehend not defecting in a prisoner's dilemma, being sociopaths), it was plainly obvious to every person even remotely connected to IT in the past two decades. If one makes a better and faster spam generator and the same unchanged program also works in reverse, by sifting through spam and condensing it to a readable summary, that it will be immediately co-opted in a spam arms race by all sides of the war and become essentially mandatory. | ||