| ▲ | avaer 9 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totally valid. If someone thinks they're building better open source with their AI, let them fork; their AI can maintain downstream. If it's really better, people will join the fork. Good luck. In all likelihood anyone attempting this will realize the value that a maintainer provides. On the odd chance they discover a new working model and produce better software, all the better, everyone wins. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | uyzstvqs 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> If it's really better, people will join the fork. That already happened. Redot is a major fork that's more community-driven and positive. They're also fine with AI use, as long as you review, understand, and take responsibility for everything you do with it. https://github.com/Redot-Engine/redot-engine They're also building a brand new game engine from scratch! https://github.com/Redot-Engine/DraconicEngine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | terminalbraid 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weird that AI is supposed to be able to enable all this and yet all we get is news about how it's really just burning out projects that have limited resources making them more expensive and companies having to hire back devs they laid off. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||