|
| ▲ | unfocso 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You "personally checked" the result (generated by an LLM, a huge black box with extensive knowledge of all fields) to the best of your knowledge. There is a mismatch between what the machine knows (and has done as the result of it) and what you think you know. Implementing a fix implies knowledge of the inner workings that brought you to it. A fix made by a LLM does not give you that. |
| |
| ▲ | sixtyj 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why do I argue here anyway? :) Before sending it I have tried the patch locally. It worked. So I sent the proposal. And it was accepted by the author. |
|
|
| ▲ | cyclopeanutopia 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Efficiency rarely is the key. |
|
| ▲ | chrisjj 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Efficiency is the key. ... and includes the reviewer efficiency disrespected by your verbose bot. |
