| ▲ | andy99 3 hours ago | |||||||
All the discussion this week have been about GLM, Qwen, etc. Both over 1000 comments in the last couple days. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48709670 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48721903 Of course Anthropic is still relevant, but people have realized they’re not special, and between this and the ID verification thing, they’ve given up a ton of their relevance vs a month ago. | ||||||||
| ▲ | modriano an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I used Fable 5 for maybe 10 hours in the window when it was available. It was much better than Opus 4.8. And I have found the Opus models to be excellent, but Fable 5 was cranking out incredible research on some data sources I wanted to plumb into my project. I wouldn't personally pay API pricing for it for my personal projects, but I bet it's going to be absolutely slammed with usage for the next month+. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | musha68k an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
As everyone knows, Kool-Aid is also just mostly water. I work in AI / infrastructure and I have never seen as much interest towards investing into sovereignty by actual deciders. Thankfully, at this point I can't see any flip-flopping / change of messaging stopping that train. In CA/EU over the last ~15 years, one used to be perceived as a bit of a "weird systems person" by just proposing alternatives to the big hyperscalers. So the Trump administration, hands-down, has been the greatest ally here. In tandem, I was hoping Anthropic would be keeping "dangerously capable" models banned from "evil Chinese distillers" for as long as possible. | ||||||||
| ▲ | datakan 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[flagged] | ||||||||