| ▲ | Why Jet Engines Aren't "Made in China"(aakash.substack.com) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27 points by paulpauper 19 hours ago | 7 comments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ivell 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a strange article. I did not find anything that is a blocker for China. China is a relative new comer to jet engines and this technology is tightly guarded by incumbents and needs time to mature. If China can master nuclear, space, chips, it seems a bit stretch to say they it is the Jer engines where they fail. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hbd-investor 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is nonsense I recognized it immediately when it claimed the J-20 only supercruises at 1.3 mach Anyone with a engineering degree understands that fighter jets carry a significant amount of fuel. The J-20 in particular carries 26,000 lbs of fuel while the F-22 carries 18,000 lbs of fuel Now here is where the disinformation comes in he cites the F-22 as mach 1.8 supercruise J-20 as mach 1.3 supercruise But the actual numbers are F-22 is mach 1.5 at full fuel load F-22 is mach 1.82 only when it is nearly empty The J-20 is mach 1.3 at full fuel load mach 1.8 only when it is nearly empty Choosing the J-20 number at full fuel load, and choosing the F-22 supercruise speed when it is nearly empty is deliberate disinformation. Your substack has lost all credibility. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||