Any minute: wear it permanently to sell training data on LLMs. Take an audited IQ test to negotiate your rate.

Better than text-stripping the internet - this thing will soon be pulling the logits as well.

"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."

"Don't be snarky."

	▲	NiloCK 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Great respect to site guidelines, and to you. Object on both counts. 1. The post was obviously bullish / optimistic on the technical capabilities. Not in the least dismissive. 2. The economics extrapolation is obvious. See current precedent for paid access for purchased screen-casts of dev work: https://pdoom.org/open_calls/04_crowd_cast.html

UltraSane 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I can actually see this happening someday. Theoretical physicists could charge thousands of dollars an hour.

if you think they're going to pay people for their data you haven't been paying attention

they'll just put it buried on page 450 of the meta glasses 3 or something

	▲	UltraSane 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		They are already paying scarce labor like medical doctors and lawyers hundreds of dollars an hour to create training data. The RoI for training data is high because it can be used to train many models.