You're probably not paying nearly enough? IDK, but pricing in tech is stretched on both ends (either way too cheap, or incredibly expensive) so much that it's hard to say anything for sure just because one is a "paying customer".

▲

throw1234567891 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> You're probably not paying nearly enough?

What are the real prices then? What is the “privacy price”?

	▲	buzer 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		2 weeks ago it was $60 billion apparently. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553224 It might be higher now.
	▲	matheusmoreira 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Some hundreds of thousands of dollars for a computer capable of local inference with GLM 5.2.

▲

cmdrmac 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Fair point. I'd add on that the company should explicitly spell out strong privacy as a feature then and charge more. Saying that "we won't use your data for training", but then not really meaning it is a bit disingenuous. How I interpret that statement may not necessarily align with the company (i.e., what kind of training?).

▲

sunaookami 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Did LLM companies pay everyone for the code and text they stole?

	▲	matheusmoreira 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No, they just reached some absurd token settlements that made a mockery of all other copyright enforcement victims. One would think dozens of SWAT officers would rappel down helicopters and storm the mansions of these big tech CEOs in order to bring them out in cuffs and serve zillion dollar fines on behalf of the so called rights holders. Kim Dotcom got destroyed while AI companies got a slap on the wrist.