> The lint flags em-dash overuse

An explicit text desloppification pass (i.e. LLM-use obfuscation) seems like outright scientific fraud.

sansseriff an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It sure is! But ironically, because of the intention behind the obfuscation. Not the fact that AI was used in a research paper.

I have no issues with AI use in science. If claude can explain my research better than me, then have at it. But I do NOT want to read a passage thinking it was written by a human when it wasn't. Science has no idea yet how such disclosures should work yet. What should be done by humans as a matter of principle, and what can't be or should not be done by humans.

	▲	dleeftink an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Some authors may even choose to leave syntactical errors as a tell for those self-authored passages; long-term, some interesting language drifts may come of it.

▲

Der_Einzige 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

We send our regards: https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15061 (ICLR 2026)