| ▲ | didgetmaster 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Every discussion about the 'top 10%' seems to make the underlying assumption that the set of people who fall under that category are consistent. While there are certainly individuals who enter the top 10% (or top 1%) and stay there; there are large numbers of people who move in and out of those categories. For me personally, I am in the top 10%; but a few decades ago, I was not. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The statistical evidence for your claim is not good. There is certainly a generational effect in that 5 year olds are typically not in the upper decile, simply because they generally have little to no individual wealth or income. But in the USA at least, most people die in the same decile they were born into. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mghackerlady 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
This is bourgeois idealism. In reality, the people in the top 10% remain there and rarely fall | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jhoechtl 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
This is a good point I haven't considered in the past and worth to take into the overall discussion. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | joe_mamba an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
[dead] | ||||||||||||||