Citizenship means having political rights. If it's decided at some point that a martian may have political rights...then yes, as it stands, their offspring would have citizenship upon birth/ejection/hatching/transmogrification or whatever means of reproduction they use.

This is really no different than if we decided that a dolphin or a naked mole rat are able to hold political rights. If an understanding that this is possible emerges, then as a logical consequence any dolphin or naked mole rat born in US jurisdiction would be a citizen.

▲

ventana 2 days ago | parent [-]

You are surely oversimplifying it. The amendment clearly says "born or naturalized"; can hatching or transmogrification be considered a birth? We need to look at the original meaning of the word "born" in 1868.

Also, it does not say anything about having political rights, just about being a "person", which will surely start a separate debate :)

	▲	qingcharles 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		At some point in the not-too-distant future this is going to recur on trying to apply the word "born" to AI, see e.g. Short Circuit II, Humans (2015)
	▲	NetMageSCW 2 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Hatching is definitely a birth (where do you think chickens come from?) but transmogrification maybe not.
	▲	fmobus 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I look forward to reading the SCOTUS opinions on "US vs Chnr'xu@jjjjjj".