| ▲ | iterateoften 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These low effort constant comments about style or formatting are against Hackernews guidelines for discussions and something needs to be done to clean up the comment section. Getting to a ridiculous point | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | aeturnum 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If comments about how "this blog post could have been a link to this github repo" are in-bounds, so are comments about how "this could have been a link to a LLM session." HN has always tried to work out if a submission is novel and interesting work or is just a slick coat of paint on mundane work (sometimes if good work is obscured by insufficiently clever presentation). Highlighting that content was generated by an LLM and asking if that impacts how to understand it is entirely in keeping with our culture and standards. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | theappsecguy 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's not about style or formatting, people are tired of reading slop. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||