Red Programming Language: Static linking support

kryptiskt 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I'm a bit surprised that Red still seems stuck at 32 bits, like it was last time I saw something about it years ago. What is the roadblock that prevents them from building 64-bit binaries? I guess it must be very hard since otherwise it would have already been fixed.

	▲	em-bee 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		i think the holdup is the lack of self-hosting. probably the rebol compiler they use can only build 32bit binaries so self-hosting and 64bit support go together. it's on the milestone for 1.0. and according to the roadmap it's a solid year of work. it's likely not the only thing they want to do for 1.0, but i think self-hosting is a big chunk

▲

uticus an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://re-bol.com/short_rebol_examples.r for some examples of the language (from https://redprogramming.com/Home.html)

	▲	em-bee 10 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		i'd be curious if red can be used as a commandline shell. the syntax should work well with it. it may just need some wrapper functions to be able to call external programs, pass arguments to them and capture the output.

▲

andsoitis 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> We must free ourselves of the hope that the sea will ever rest. We must learn to sail in high winds. -Aristotle Onassis

Love that quote. More poetic than my quip “Hope is not a strategy”.

▲

naltun an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Always nice to see Red updates (thanks for sharing)