| ▲ | myst 8 hours ago |
| I’m genuinely confused. Was there any doubt before this study that sport makes people healthier? |
|
| ▲ | dgacmu 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| No, but past recommendations for older adults (note that the average age in the study was 72 years old) were towards "gentle" or moderate exercise. We're seeing a shift now towards recommending real weight lifting and higher intensity as we age. ("Real" -> closer to powerlifting in terms of goals and methods) |
| |
| ▲ | dev_tty01 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It says nothing about weightlifting. The high intensity training is on a treadmill. Also, "changes were small and not clinically meaningful compared with exercise of lower intensity and considering measurement error." The study is really not noteworthy and certainly not a basis for changing any population wide recommendations. | | |
| ▲ | dgacmu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm giving context for why a study of higher intensity cardio -in older people- might be interesting to people, and why it's not just "exercise good" |
| |
| ▲ | faangguyindia 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | why is it powerlifting? general prescription these days for Hypertrophy is 10 sets per muscle group per week 0-3 RIR. | | |
| ▲ | dgacmu 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Mostly because functional strength is useful and keeps you alive. major goals as you age are avoiding falls and being able to continue doing things for yourself. Strength fits that bill pretty well (and it also improves fat free mass). And on a slightly more technical note, recovering from higher volume becomes harder as you age, so focusing on a smaller number (5ish) of reps at higher weight gives you adaptation without quite as much stress. But I should be clear, when I said real lifting, I don't mean to exclude any form of well calibrated progressive overload, whether that's strength focused or hypertrophy focused. I do mean to exclude the "go to the gym and lift a 10 lb weight the same number of reps each time" BS | |
| ▲ | rokob 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Because hypertrophy is generally pointless compared to strength. The hyperthrophy that naturally accompanies strength work is sufficient but the strength that accompanies hypertrophy work is far less beneficial. | | |
| ▲ | faangguyindia 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | one of the best proxy we've for Hypertrophy is getting progressively stronger in medium rep range. (8-12) The title says they are focused on improving body composition which is boosting lean mass, lowering of fat mass which kinda seems achieved best by focusing on Hypertrophy and fat loss? |
| |
| ▲ | ehnto 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hypertrophy and strength aren't as strongly linked as we thought. Generally for wellness, injury prevention, you want strength and flexibility. | | |
| ▲ | 10xDev 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Your strength comes both from your nervous system and physiology. Training your nervous system without also building a proper physical foundation to handle tension is a fast track to injury. | |
| ▲ | bluecheese452 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What? They are incredibly linked. |
|
| |
| ▲ | fedeb95 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | read the study more carefully if you think it encourages powerlifting for the elders. | | |
| ▲ | dgacmu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Read my comment more carefully if you think I'm describing the study instead of providing more general context for why people might find this particular study interesting. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mDyJzDPmBdG 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There was plenty of obvious, common sense assumptions that didn't hold at all when methodically tested, like sugar rush in children. And this specific type of studies tries to find a sweet spot between benefits and effort taken. Some results were unexpected, If I recall correctly on found that having to take three flights of stairs daily outperformed many exercise regimes designed for elderly. |
|
| ▲ | ehnto 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have met people who figured, because they don't excercise they don't wear their body out, so their joints etc. will last longer. Same for injury, no sport no injury, that must be good! |
| |
| ▲ | lukan 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In a way this is right with high intense/extreme sport. (I did Thai Boxing in my youth, but stopped at some point) But it is very wrong otherwise, joints for example will suffer if not moved. Blood will only flow into all the areas of the joints if they are moved. And if you don't move, your muscles will be gone and without muscles to hold your joints, loss of stability, great risk of injury, etc. | | |
| ▲ | busymom0 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | And don't forget benefits of weight training in improving bone density and preventing osteoporosis as we age. | | |
| ▲ | lukan 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | And strengthening the nerves and all the other body parts that degrade with being idle. |
|
| |
| ▲ | arnejenssen 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I got codex to count my total heartbeats from my Garmin data. For four random days the counts were 72.252, 73.823, 68.922, 70.991. According to google: "typical range for total heartbeats is 86,400 to 115,200 beats per day" I run every day which would add a lot of beats, but my resting HR is 36 (pushed down by exercise i presume) with a daily average of 50 BPM. So in total a trained person may spend less of their heart beats. | |
| ▲ | arnejenssen 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Charlie Munger thought of exercise as adding mileage to the car. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Most people who talk about adding milage to a car have never tried to keep an old car running. Those who do have long learned that milage is a tiny issue, age is a much larger factor. They have also learned that low milage is a bad sign - what is wrong that you only drove it that much: often the answer is city driving which puts a lot more wear on the car than highway driving. |
| |
| ▲ | ksaj 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Donald Trump is one who also believes this. Apparently he believes you only have so many heartbeats, and so you should avoid increasing your pulse. | | |
| ▲ | bluGill 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | People who exercise regularly have a lower resting heart rate. You can likely remove 10,000 heartbeats per day just by doing 20 minutes of exerciser per day. I don't believe the limited heartbeats theory, but it does support the idea of exercise. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nayroclade 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That wasn't what this study was investigating. |
| |
|
| ▲ | atwrk 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Well I guess reading the article could ease your confusion. Unsurprisingly it is a bit less generalized than your take. |
|
| ▲ | ButlerianJihad 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Sports and exercise are definitely beneficial, but any sort of activity presents a risk of injury. If people work out, or play sports, without knowing proper form, without using protection or precautions, they'll get injured and then worse off than before. Realistically, manual laborers should be in real good shape, but often their jobs are so low-wage, and they're so interchangeable, that safety precautions are ignored and must be regulated/enforced. I took up roller skating and was rewarded with a broken leg. I took up gym exercise and was repaid with a hernia. Both required surgery. No regrets! Only wished I could've better understood how to exercise safely! I once encountered a FB group that was for people to discuss "sports injuries sustained while we were in bed" and I could totally relate, having done weird stuff to my shoulder overnight, rather than pitching a baseball game... |