| ▲ | amarant a day ago |
| Doing business with the US is just impossible these days. If this trend continues any further the US is gonna end up a piranha state with no allies and no business partners. I'm really not sure what consequences that'll have for the rest of the world, but it looks like we're about to find out |
|
| ▲ | recursive-call a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| pariah: outcast, disliked piranha: carnivorous fish |
| |
| ▲ | Etheryte a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Also piranha: Brazilian Portugese slang for hooker. | | | |
| ▲ | mistersquid a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > piranha: carnivorous fish Nice callout. Neither here nor there, but many (most?) fish are carnivorous. | | |
| ▲ | nicoburns a day ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the key difference with piranhas is that they eat humans. Most carnivorous fish eat other fish or water-dwelling creatures. | |
| ▲ | coderbants a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Name checks out. | |
| ▲ | 21asdffdsa12 21 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Pesca pescatarian - would be a cuisine made entirely of fish that eat other fish? | |
| ▲ | Timon3 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Apparently not piranhas, they seem to be omnivorous! |
| |
| ▲ | Lucasoato a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Pearà: very peppery cream from Verona, served best with boiled meat | |
| ▲ | rusk a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sounds right | |
| ▲ | bryanrasmussen a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | everybody loves piranha! | |
| ▲ | IncreasePosts a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | paraná: a state/river in southern Brazil | | |
|
|
| ▲ | penguin_booze 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As long as US dollar remains the reserve currency, others will have to suck up to the US. This is why moving away from the USD is critical. Beyond that, people should pull their investments away from the US. This is difficult, however: US is the market that offers most returns (as to for how long, that remains to be seen), but it takes only a initial dominos falling. |
|
| ▲ | 0xy 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The EU will rely on US tech forever because it is literally not possible to create an EU alternative in that business climate. There are no major EU clouds, nor are there any major EU software services and there never will be because the EU is the worst place in the entire world for startups (try starting a company in Germany or France). |
| |
| ▲ | buzer 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | > nor are there any major EU software services and there never will be SAP and Spotify come to my mind first. Some ex-EU services include Skype and Booking.com (latter might still be counted as EU service depending on definition). |
|
|
| ▲ | rusk a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The concern is not so much that the US will lose friends moreso that other business partners will become more prominent. The US has a lot of social capital to burn. I’m not certain that somebody hasn’t calculated how much they can get away with… |
|
| ▲ | coffe2mug a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sadly nothing will change. - Pretty sure a large number of politicians are using claude, chatGPT etc. - Majority of researchers in EU are dependent of all of US SV companies. There are nothing equivalent. EVen if there is mistral or other open source llms - every damn Uni/company is uploading everything to claude or open AI or gemini. - Majority see these but just move on - 99% of EU politicians either dont care or show apathy or worse live in a moat - Ideally EU could have forced iphone, Google to openup. They did not. - Same with taxation. Ireland fights EU to give tax breaks - Its f*king broken system |
|
| ▲ | vlian2088 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
|
| ▲ | drstewart a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Who WILL become a pariah state is the EU as they continue to antagonize the biggest economies in the world: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/29/eu-introduces-... Meanwhile Trump threatened China with 100+% tariffs. The EU just suspended an exemption for small personal packages that was due to expire in 2028 anyway. Why should the EU be the pariah? | |
| ▲ | amarant a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean, if you saw the Canadian PMs speech at davos, you'd know "the west" is already distancing itself from the US. This is not a hypothetical, it has begun. It's not like trade deals are ripped up over night, it's gonna take a while to have noticeable effect, but it is happening, and has been happening for over a year. | | |
| ▲ | drstewart a day ago | parent [-] | | A speech is the definition of a hypothetical. I can show you a million Trump speeches that "show" the opposite. Something tells me you wont take those as gospel for some reason. >It's not like trade deals are ripped up over night Oh really? I thought we're ABOUT to find out what it's like to have no allies or business partners? Weird! >it's gonna take a while to have noticeable effect Ah, the magic "it's happening but I can't prove it, so trust me bro". Meanwhile, I can point you to tangible metrics showing the world is moving away from the EU to China, meaning the EU will have zero trade with anyone else in short order (trust me it's really happening). | | |
| ▲ | 2muchcoffeeman a day ago | parent [-] | | False equivalency. Trump constantly says whatever he wants in plain contradiction to verifiable facts:
The strait is open!
We win the war!
I’m not in the Epstein files! | | |
| ▲ | drstewart a day ago | parent [-] | | Those may be the facts now, but not forever. It's gonna take a while to have noticeable effect. That doesn't mean what he's saying is not about to come true. | | |
| ▲ | 2muchcoffeeman a day ago | parent [-] | | You mean that one day all the Epstein files will change to no longer contain countless mentions of Trump? How do you supposed this will happen? Through destruction of evidence or the invention of a Time Machine to warn his younger self? |
|
|
|
|
|