| ▲ | whatever1 7 hours ago |
| I wonder how Germany missed the semi manufacturing train? They had literally everything: universities, manufacturing culture, expertise and supporting supply chains, cash. I forgot, they also had ASML, freaking next door! |
|
| ▲ | cherryteastain 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| They had a large memory manufacturer, Infineon, who spun out their memory division as Qimonda which then went bankrupt [1]. They were the 2nd largest in the world at one time apparently. Looking back, it's easy to say the German govt should have thrown them a billion or two to keep them afloat. However, state intervention was very unpopular at the time in economic circles, and there was much furor over bailouts following the 2008 crisis. Japan has an even sadder story. They were the DRAM top dog for a very long time. South Korea entirely ate their lunch. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qimonda |
| |
|
| ▲ | GuB-42 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I wonder how Germany missed the semi manufacturing train? My best guess is that the connecting train was operated by the Deutsche Bahn |
| |
|
| ▲ | jdw64 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Realistically, when it comes to the semiconductor market, there aren't many viable options outside of East Asia. I don't mean this in the sense that East Asians were somehow "chosen," but rather that the semiconductor industry inherently requires a large number of highly educated employees working together. The problem is that the working hours inevitably end up being very long. If you actually go work at one of those facilities, you have to wear a "cleanroom suit" (bunny suit), and it's physically demanding. What I'm saying is, you need highly educated personnel who can be mobilized at any time when a problem breaks out in the middle of the night, and who can be hired at relatively low cost. East Asia has a massive educational infrastructure — schools are very large-scale and the system is extremely well-developed — making it hard for other regions to compete. And indeed, the average working hours in countries that do semiconductor manufacturing are extremely long In other words, it's an industry where you have to grind white-collar workers as if they were blue-collar laborers. |
| |
| ▲ | tomkat0789 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I’ve always wondered what is unique about semiconductors that PhDs need to work like assembly line workers. I’m sure they’re not solving partial differential equations all day, but what’s so different between different batches of chips? | | |
| ▲ | sbierwagen 29 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Answer: they don't, they just work them into the ground because they can. Mainland China also has the 996 schedule for office workers purely as a cargo cult ritual, forcing people to sit at a desk at midnight and pantomime doing work. | |
| ▲ | jdw64 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The industry inherently deals with extremely hazardous chemicals, and on top of that, during semiconductor production, there are many things that have to be recorded and tracked. A lot of the processes are automated, but at the points where automation hasn't reached, there are quite a few things that are genuinely complex to handle. | |
| ▲ | bee_rider 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I think it’s more like highly skilled technicians, to scale up. Plus PhDs and other scientists to do the simulations and analyze the data for new designs. |
| |
| ▲ | fakedang 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I believe some of the earliest Intel fabs were in New Mexico (Shiprock and Rio Rancho). What combination of the above did New Mexico have? When New Mexico and Germany had fabs, South Korea was still a developing country ruled by a brutal dictatorship. What happened was simple - both Taiwan and South Korea and now China took concerted steps in investing into their semiconductors businesses. South Korea did this indirectly through favourable arrangements for the industry players via the chaebol system, while China and Taiwan did this with more direct government investment into the industry. Sure, you can't just dump money into the industry and become a semiconductor player, else the Middle Eastern countries would have tried that ages ago. Yes, the talent being locally present is important but you're once again bringing up tired tropes about Asian working culture as being relevant. | | |
| ▲ | numpad0 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Feels like the real clash happening here is that the reality is suggesting that the values of mean educational level of the bottom 99% of workforce outweighs that of the top 1%, and that being uncomfortable to some so much so that there has to be something else. But isn't that just it? There's a story in one of Feynman's memoir where he figures out that pausing the live system and debugging its physical RAM stack is turning out to be more time consuming than simply scheduling a new corrected task, on some particular 1940s mechanical supercomputer he was assigned to as a tech. It might not have taken Feynman to notice that, but you can assign Feynman for that, and it worked for the Manhattan project. The parent comment isn't (just) reiterating the tired tropes, but pointing out that East Asia has an "educational base" similar to industrial base that supports its high tech. I don't think that much is so strange way of thinking. The state of ME countries(maybe except Iran) soft proves it - they don't believe in such a thing. And they don't have a semiconductor industry. Pure coincidence? I doubt it. (And on "This isn't about Asian superiority — it's actually pointing out something bad about Asia." from jdw64, yuuup 100% it is quad plus bad - IMO a thing about East Asia is that there's zero inter-national mobility due to the notoriously high language barrier, so competitions are closed to within borders, and the bar just drift skywards indefinitely because of that. There was a massive domestic hiring freeze in Japan during the 90s that made "janitors with a PhD" actually not so rare, but none of them hit the global labor market or started companies - the Japanese bar for janitors just went up to PhDs. It is said that success of Japanese 7-11 was partially attributable to that event, that, when you happen to have all the cashiers manned 24/7 with top scientists, you can just throw million different tasks and they can handle it perfectly, put aside whether they're happily doing it) | |
| ▲ | jdw64 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'm not saying Asian culture is the main factor. Yes, it's true that authoritarian governance driven by dictatorial regimes and chaebol politics has played a strong role, but fundamentally, the long working hours are simply inherent to this business. You brought up the New Mexico story quite well, but that place is notorious for the exploitation of Navajo women's labor. In the first place, the factory was occupied and shut down by the American Indian Movement. You know full well that this is a story about the exploitation of Native Americans, so why are you bringing it up like that? The history of Shiprock itself is, at its core, a history of "cheap, obedient labor." You frame it only as state-led investment, but the reality is that the culture behind it is complex. What my post is pointing out is not that "Asian culture is superior." What I'm pointing out is the harsh working conditions in Asia — where working hours are extremely long, and even highly educated workers are inevitably subjected to grueling hours. Why do you think TSMC's Arizona fab in the U.S. keeps getting delayed? The U.S. invested money through the CHIPS Act, but American engineers refuse to accept the "military-style 24/7 on-call readiness and brutal shift work" that exists in Taiwan. TSMC founder Morris Chang himself has pointed this out before. What I'm saying is that the educational infrastructure is so well-established that it's easy to produce a large supply of highly educated workers, and that these highly educated workers then have to be submissive to inhumane working conditions. This isn't about Asian superiority — it's actually pointing out something bad about Asia. But from the context of your comment, it seems like you misunderstood me as saying "Asian work culture is superior" and replied based on that assumption. That was never my intention. Before you leave a comment, I'd ask you to show some basic respect to others. | | |
| ▲ | nl 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is extrapolating from a single example of something that has worked and the conflating correlation with causation. There are plenty of places with highly educated cheap workforces who work hard. Eastern European culture is almost identical down to the whole "tiger mom" stereotype. And there are numerous counter examples: Ireland has a huge semiconductor industry: https://www.siliconrepublic.com/careers/semiconductor-compan... The US is full of the "military-style 24/7 on-call readiness and brutal shift work" - at the high end silicon valley is built on this, and at the low end every single non-unionized factory is this. TSMC has never built a fab outside Taiwan. Of course there will be problems. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | gruntled-worker 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Chip fab locations have traditionally had more political than economic importance. Matrix multiplication chips and RAM have been the recent exception, while TSMC has long been the geopolitical exception. ASML's location only matters to the extent that it gets ordered not to sell to someone. |
| |
|
| ▲ | woadwarrior01 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The AMD spinoff GlobalFoundries has a fab in Dresden. |
|
| ▲ | throwaway219450 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Intel was supposed to build a fab in Magdeburg, which would have been great, but apparently the reason it was canned (2025) was they couldn't secure enough customers. |
|
| ▲ | paulmist 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| IIRC Taiwan took a page out of Singapore's playbook and went all in on electrical engineering and adjecent fields. It was very much a long-term strategy. Germany probably didn't feel nearly as much pressure, and was already very strong in all industry. |
|
| ▲ | fennecbutt 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Memory has only really recently become lucrative. Germany still has heavy machinery, trains, drilling machines etc all of which will be needed for a long time regardless of whether the "bubble pops" or not. |
| |
| ▲ | tw04 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Most of those now need memory to function. At some point it becomes a national security issue. | | |
| ▲ | fennecbutt 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's not really a gotcha, because my train doesn't need a TB of dram. | | |
| ▲ | Schiendelman 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Heavy machinery is starting to. Computer vision for robots is a big deal, and takes quite a bit of processing power. Robotic mining, earthmoving, and even construction equipment is exactly where Germany will innovate. Not to mention drones - Rheinmetall needs DRAM... |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | neonstatic 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The Germany fetish still going strong I see. |
|
| ▲ | repler 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Siemens? |
|
| ▲ | zuzululu 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
|
| ▲ | brcmthrowaway 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Germany is done. |