| ▲ | paisawalla 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[flagged] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ipython 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I do want violent criminals prosecuted. But the problem is that there is a very clear signal given that prosecution is highly selective. I made my point earlier - if this administration cared about prosecuting violent criminals, they would never have even considered pardoning the J6 criminals. They would additionally call for swift and thorough investigations on the use of force against the killings of protesters in Minneapolis in order to ensure that law enforcement is seen as accountable to the public. But none of that has happened. And won’t happen. It astounds me that this hypocrisy isn’t screaming like nails on a chalkboard! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ipython 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Btw - > If you want to concede that it's fascist to want violent criminals prosecuted, I believe it is fascist to bring trumped up charges for ridiculousness. Say for example the case of “sandwich guy” who the DoJ spent three attempts at a grand jury to bring federal charges. For throwing a fully loaded Subway sandwich at a kitted out ICE officer. Started by sending a full swat team of twenty armed agents to his apartment. Complete with a slickly produced propaganda video for your enjoyment! https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1956114803295953325 Mind you this is, once again, for the violent crime of throwing an Italian hoagie at a federal officer with full body armor. Then they failed to get a grand jury to indict him on felony assault … finally charging him with misdemeanor assault. Thankfully he was acquitted. Tell me that’s not fascist. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ndsipa_pomu 38 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I think if you append "with the intention to commit a violent crime" to each item on the list, you'll see the issue. That's problematic as you could literally append that to any action and thus condemn it as illegal e.g. met to have some coffees and a chat ... with the intention to commit a violent crime. The problem is that there's not necessarily any connection between the activity and the alleged violent crime - that's what needs to be proven such as highlighting specific signal conversations that were evidence of planning the crime. Also, what is problematic about first aid kits? How is being in a "concealed" position problematic? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | OutOfHere 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I think if you append "with the intention to commit a violent crime" to each item on the list, you'll see the issue. No, that doesn't fly, and the intent isn't clear. Even if there were intent, those three bullet points still are not an crime or valid charges. As a member of the jury, I would reject them 100%. Extending your pitiful logic just a few steps, people would be locked up for 30 years just for being born. > If you want to concede that it's fascist to want violent criminals prosectued No relation. Violent crime must of course be prosecuted, but it shouldn't have to depend on trumped up charges or weak accusations of intent. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | goatlover an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICE has behaved as violent criminals during Trump's 2nd term. Renee Good and Alex Pretty were murders. There have been other shootings ICE initiated. How many have died in ICE facilities under suspicious circumstances? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||