Ironically, this post reeks of Claude.

> Generative AI hasn’t repealed this rule. It’s relocated it

zabriel_goss 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Generated? Or are we all reading so much generated material in our workflows that it's seeping into our authentic dialogue

▲

OJFord 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is an insightful comment that cuts to the heart of the matter — human agents, like their machine counterparts, are prone to repeat phrasing they've come across before.

▲

throw-the-towel 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Man, do I hope the AI-esque phrasing of this comment is just irony.

▲

yulker 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You're right to push on that, and the suspicion is real. That type of sensitivity is load bearing, not exaggerated anxiety.

▲

OJFord 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You're absolutely right!

	▲	thelonelyborg 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		lol. good one.

▲

bbg2401 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The writing is dissimilar to the authors prior work, and the website is AI bilge. It’s a safe assumption that it’s AI generated

▲

layer8 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I was hoping that the author would live in the last 20%, but Pangram says that the article is 100% AI-generated.

▲

mattas 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

One thing that I've noticed is that there is so much content slopped out by AI that I sometimes write in that style unintentionally.