| ▲ | romankolpak 2 hours ago | |||||||
What’s the alternative? How do you solve the problem of not allowing children into online spaces where they shouldn’t be allowed in? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Tade0 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Parents who wish to have both the child and themselves remain sane are already watching over the way their offspring uses the internet. Truth be told the worst kind of content is nominally child friendly - just incredibly addictive and overstimulating. We're all so preoccupied with preventing our children from looking at gore or porn or even meeting predators online that we forget that those who stand to make money on addictive content will pull every lever necessary. | ||||||||
| ▲ | philipallstar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
We should assign one or two adults to children who provide for them, and prevent various dangers, including online ones, from reaching them. It sounds like a lot of effort, but it is also the most important task on the planet. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | big85 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The existing paradigm is on-device parental controls. It's worked for the past 30 years, and the alternative is forcing everyone to show government ID to use websites. | ||||||||