It is a problem in itself. First they want to know your age (they're pretending: of course they want to know your identity, but let's leave that for a moment).

What's next? Your US legal status as determined by your ethnicity? Scan your face to prove you're white? Yeah, that sounds absolutely ridiculous but so did the age verification with KYC just a few years ago.

▲

Rebuff5007 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Why are those things naturally "whats next"?

We allow bars and car companies to verify age before conducting business. Does that in itself lead to racial discrimination? I think not.

▲

usrnm 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The issue is the scale and centralization of information. Let's imagine that every bar has to not only check the id of every customer but do it automatically: every time you enter a bar anywhere in the country you must have your id scanned by a government-issued system. Are you still ok with it?

▲

stymaar 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That's why we need privacy preserving designs.

But saying “we must abandon the idea of age verification in bar” is never going to work in any democratic setting.

Voters genuinely want to protect the children, without second thoughts.

	▲	jonathanstrange an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Why do parental software / settings and filters not work? Aren't there even approaches based on whitelisting?