| ▲ | Waterluvian 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Being hand written would be silly theatre that excludes perfectly capable people (like me) who cannot sustain writing more than a few minutes. Edit: I think we’re actually all agreeing. That a typed exam as an option is perfectly cromulent. I’m just saying the idea that it must be written is silly. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | glimshe 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I don't want to dismiss your limitation, but it's better to create an acommodation for your particular case than to prevent the system from being implemented for everybody else. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | shermantanktop 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Writing by hand for extended periods is a capability. It was mandatory in an earlier age. Now it has become optional, but it could become mandatory again. Presumably someone who is unable would get an accommodation of some kind. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | notreallyauser 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Gen Xer here: we coped with hand written exams just fine. Accommodations (extra time and/or a scribe) were available for those who needed them. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | woodruffw 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I don't think it's theatre, in the sense that it is effective for the advertised purpose (preempting AI-based cheating). But it seems to me like there are also plenty of ways to make reasonable accommodations for people who can't do a pen-and-paper exam, such as an offline computer. | ||||||||||||||