Yes, and the article author is fully aware of that. Thank you for pointing out this small mistake though.

▲ mkagenius 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It looks like the author is specifically avoiding model's name, because results are really weird.

  Opus 4.8/4.7 scored 28%

  Opus 4.6 score 37%

So the author thought as let's not get into that just write Claude.

	▲	happycube an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not weird at all, given the variance in Opus' quality over the last few months. wild guess - I wouldn't be surprised if Opus 4.6 was run quantized for a while, and 4.7/4.8 have QAT for that nerfed size.
	▲	andriy_koval 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		many people think opus 4.6 was the best