Maybe the Concord and Comet. For the rest of the list I think you'd spend a very long time finding people to agree with you. The soviet ones are even more complicated, the Tu-144 is basically an Ugly Concord.

▲

spankibalt 3 hours ago | parent [-]

So or so, Bogost's statement is akin to describing the Amiga 500 as the only beautiful home computer. And that's obviously ridiculous. As for your statement, nah, I won't have to search very long for people agreeing with me on many of the aircraft listed; whole coffee table tomes have been published specifically dealing with the subject of Soviet, French and British classic, especially narrow-body, airliners.

	▲	watersb 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm reading through the comments here before reading the actual Atlantic story, so I didn't see the author's name until you mention it: > Bogost's statement is akin to calling the Amiga 500 the only home computer to be called beautiful. Oh! That's Ian Bogost, who is a great writer of how our relationship with technology can evoke truth and beauty. The canonical work is his deep dive on the Atari 2600 and the early 1980s revolution "Racing the Beam": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racing_the_Beam Bogost wrote a number of books while working with MIT, arguing that video games were a new medium of communication back when that was a controversial point of view. (I will need to re-subscribe to The Atlantic at some point. It seems churlish, but it's been an expensive year...)