This is the media equivalent of showing a family swimming on the lake when discussing heatwave death. You have valid life experience but it’s not relevant to the topic at hand.

▲

duxup an hour ago | parent [-]

It's relevant. We're people sharing and discussing, not a TV show.

The idea that if we're discussing a problem that only people with that problem may share their experience is absurd at face value.

▲

DetroitThrow an hour ago | parent [-]

"10% of Americans are uninsured. A US state is pushing to insure all of their residents."

"I'm insured!"

"Open-source software projects are being spammed with LLM generated PRs. Contributions are becoming more restricted".

"I have a repo that isn't being spammed!"

Sometimes sharing a somewhat related experience is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand, and also completely uninteresting. It does not matter that somehow their "experience is valid".

▲

duxup an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This is a forum where people share their opinions and experience, not a TV show or news story or narrative.

If people's opinions or thoughts don't fit a narrative you want, a forum likely isn't the place to find it.

Everyone gets to share, there's no rules here about not sharing / having a different experience than others.

	▲	grayhatter a minute ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Everyone gets to share, there's no rules here about not sharing / having a different experience than others. I disagree that this is a fair interpretation of the original objection. But assuming it is a possible interpretation, "that doesn't happen to me" isn't sharing an experience, it's sharing the lack of an experience. Sure, yes, everyone does get to share, on a public forum, expecting otherwise is dumb. On that, 100% with you! And yet, I feel like there's an important difference between sharing how your favorite color is blue, after someone said they like red the best, and sharing how you're not being mistreated, when someone is asking for help to stop someone from mistreating them. You see how one is everyone sharing together, and the other appears to minimize the mistreatment of someone else?
	▲	DetroitThrow an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Everyone gets to share but it's also completely within the forum rules to call out irrelevant anecdotes as uninteresting to the discussion. I have no idea why you're making a comparison to a TV show; nothing that was described was anything akin to that. I just made examples out of insufferable and clueless forum comments, that very clearly detract from discussion more than they contribute to it. I don't think you should assume that describing meaningless and unrelated anecdotes as "uninteresting" is equivalent to users calling for a forum ban, which is seemingly what you're doing when you point to forum rules when encountering a critique.

▲

shimman an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Notice how it's always the plight of people that always get immediately dismissed while the incoherent ramblings of tech leaders like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Dario Amodei are always taken at face value and immediately never questioned.