Why not just outlaw sex? If looking at sex is illegal they might as well go all the way.

Because in their philosophy sex serves a purpose (procreation and the deepening of the marital union).

Anything that doesn’t support those two aims (contraception, abortion, gay marriage, pornography etc.) is therefore immoral but there’s nothing wrong with sex in its ‘proper’ context.

	▲	microgpt 20 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Their philosophy is extremely inconsistent. In reality it's emotionally driven. Not sure what specific emotions cause one to think sex is wrong except for reproduction, but a lot of the people who push this sort of thing turn out to be closeted gay homophobes.

▲

throw9398449 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It is already outlawed in any practical mean. There is no proper way to consent. If participant changes their mind ten years latter, good luck at court!

▲

hoppp 38 minutes ago | parent [-]

What you mean no way to consent? We can talk or use non-verbal communication.

Marriage is by itself not consent for sex and you can't sue somebody to get them to have sex with you either

	▲	microgpt 18 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's a redpill/misogynist/incel/Tate-style talking point, they have this meme that women just file rape charges against everyone they ever regret having sex with.