|
| ▲ | Retric 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Companies ultimately don’t have a choice here. They can do what works, or they can fail. Large enough companies with enough inertia can do really dumb things for a while, but even giants fall. |
| |
| ▲ | wiether 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm confused by your answer because I can't tell which way you're going. Are you saying companies have to mandate AI everywhere? Or are you saying the exact opposite, as your second sentence suggests? I haven't heard of AI mandates in small companies, only in big ones. | | |
| ▲ | delusional 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | He's just making a general "efficient markets" argument. He's arguing that whatever happens in a couple of years will be the right thing, no matter what is happening now. That is essentially not an argument in any direction. | | |
| |
| ▲ | lordkrandel 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If it works. Where is this 100x software output? I just see more AI tools to check it does not derail, but where is the actual software revolution, where all developers are fired? I'm still closing AI PR slop here | |
| ▲ | tonyhart7 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | or they just need really capable AI that are better than 99% human |
|
|
| ▲ | lazide 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That just means he’s not a middle manager or exec, not that he isn’t cashing the check from someone who is clearly a short sighted idiot. |
| |
| ▲ | xantronix 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It wasn't meant to be a literal statement, more just a reflection that the situation is so bleak that I cannot imagine a better future; anybody expressing even a little bit of it seems to me like a somebody who has not been crushed into compliance through force. Quoting the host of the recurring Quiz Broadcast sketch from That Mitchell and Webb Look: "Books mention 'hope'. What was 'hope'?" |
|
