| ▲ | diogenescynic 2 hours ago |
| It will just be abused like the money for in-home daycares and elder care is. I'd rather they just lower our taxes and quit squandering our money on these programs that never work. I never once hear democrats looking to lower taxes or remove wasteful spending, it's practically encouraged. They defend SNAP recipients buying soda and candy even while admitting there's a correlation between SNAP recipients and having diabetes and being overweight. They do the wrong thing and know it and expect us to ignore that and keep funding these programs. |
|
| ▲ | glenpierce 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The reason you never hear that is because waste and fraud are very low in reality. That’s why this made the news. It’s uncommon. We should be using the government to help people and when we do, it often does a good job. Examples:
Roads, libraries, fire departments, schools, safety regulations… |
| |
| ▲ | coryrc 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Our public transportation infrastructure literally cost 10x per mile than France or Hong Kong. That's not waste to you? For what California has spent/is spending on high-speed rail from nowhere to nowhere, China blanketed their country? Notice you also left out police. How's our spending working there? | | |
| ▲ | dgoldstein0 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | California high speed rail has been a mess. Which is likely in part because politics dictating routes has raised the costs and timelines substantially. On a smaller scale SF was building a new subway in 2013 that had been on the drawing board for years. I remember thinking maybe I'd ride it to work one day. Opened in 2023 or 2024, after I had moved offices twice and then went to work from home. It's not a terrible line but because it had to go to the center of our Chinatown instead of 2 blocks over, it took quite a bit longer and became the deepest subway line in the city. Several other bits of stupidity too in that project but a big piece of the delayed timeline was that tunneling in SF is hard. Plenty of other transit projects exist that have made real differences. Personally I'm a fan of the simple improvements: revised bus routes with dedicated bus lanes and improved stop & shelters, added bike lanes, etc. those sorts of projects are relatively cheap investments and while no single one is a silver bullet they add up. On a bigger scale - Caltrain's electrification was a big win. Both kinds of projects are easier than building whole new tracks or digging new tunnels. Extend and improve the existing systems. Most cities have something to start from. | |
| ▲ | windows_hater_7 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’d note that China does not need democratic approval for any of its projects and thus is substantially more efficient. | | |
| |
| ▲ | coryrc an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | And another, our recidivism rates are much higher than comparable countries. Is that how we do a "good job" helping people? |
|
|
| ▲ | ZenoArrow 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > I'd rather they just lower our taxes and quit squandering our money on these programs that never work. Would you support cutting military spending? It's a lot higher than other countries. |
| |
| ▲ | WalterBright an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > It's a lot higher than other countries. That's because the US also defends the free world. Besides, not spending enough on the military can get very, very expensive. | | |
| ▲ | deaux an hour ago | parent [-] | | > That's because the US also defends the free world. The US invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Iraq have sure helped defend the free world. How many trillions went into those combined? Fantastic return per $ of "free world defense". | | |
| |
| ▲ | diogenescynic an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Definitely and we should have affordable universal healthcare and subsidized state university tuition. Everything else should be cut as much as possible. I don't see any programs that are working well. |
|
