| ▲ | Aurornis 3 hours ago | |||||||
> and wonder if perhaps 99% of normies are just following the directions on the package of their $19 Chinese IP camera. I doubt that the instructions for a cheap camera have enough information to walk a non-technical user through the process of setting up port forwarding on their specific router. I could believe that it’s automatic port forwarding via UPnP for some of these cameras. However a lot of them are from contractors who install the cameras for people as a service and this is the only way they know how to get them remote access. It’s the same reason different industrial controls and other machines keep getting exposed to the internet. Some installer with a git-er-done attitude knows their customer wants a solution to something (remote access) and they use the first technique they can find to accomplish that without any concern about what it means. They accomplish the thing the customer wants, collect payment, and disappear. If the customer calls back with a complaint about it, the contractor will happily come visit the site and try to “fix” it for another fee. If you’re thinking that this is a liability issue you’re not wrong, but in much of the world there is no realistic recourse. Most things like this are pure caveat emptor. | ||||||||
| ▲ | naturalmovement 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Most CCTV contractors are not network security experts. Most network security experts would quit before ever entering a hot attic. So Cletus the CCTV guy who just spent 8 hours crawling through drop ceilings with a mask on, does a super-clean install, and sets it up as well as he knows how. Which is "good enough" — it works and he's off to the next job. The customer's happy and he gets paid. Now which one of you network security guys is going to give up his cushy WFH job to go make house calls for CCTV wages? | ||||||||
| ||||||||