Do you know how many things throughout history people claimed confidently they could definitely tell the difference when it was later scientifically proven that they could not? And in all cases they believed that they were actually special and they were in fact correct despite the fact that this keeps happening.

▲

SwellJoe 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't think I'm special. I think many people can tell the difference.

Edit: Also, I'm surprised images have gotten to the point where I have a hard time detecting AI in some cases, and they got there more quickly than prose. I really thought prose would be the first to fall. Video is still detectable. Music still detectable (by someone that enjoys music and pays attention to it). But, AI prose still outs itself pretty quickly.

	▲	SwellJoe 27 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		OK, this is a silly thing to do, but I wanted to be sure I wasn't imagining that I can tell when prose is written by AI. So I made a game. Turns out Claude Opus can fool me better than any other model, but even it can't fool me a majority of the time. I average about 85% accuracy on this (Claude prepared the corpus, I'm going in with very little foreknowledge). GLM is also very close to being able to convincingly write like a human. I'm not as good at detecting AI as I expected I would be, but I'm still pretty consistently able to detect AI prose. https://prose-or-con.com GPT 4o likes writing poetry with bees in it, for some reason. Qwen models are decidedly purple in their prose.