| ▲ | helterskelter 14 hours ago | |||||||
Problem is that there's always some poorer community, or one with more corrupt government officials, willing to allow a buildout for next to nothing. And when they plug into the grid the next county or state over you're electric rates are going up anyway. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sandcat_ 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Eh, this is a bit fatalist. Every bit of pushback is a tax. If a company applies to build in X location but is threatening to move to Y location where it's cheaper, or they can get away with something, there's obviously a reason they'd prefer X. They wouldn't be arguing otherwise. So if they are "forced" to move to Y, that's a tax. See also: working at unethical tech firms, fears over the rich leaving NYC, etc. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | mindslight 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
The other problem is the rule of law is breaking down, so those contractual promises aren't really binding - rather the federal regime can always override any such restrictions with tales about energy policy or needing to compete with China (even as they squander our advantages on both). When you're one bribe away from being on the end of a vice signalling two minute hate, it's best to not give them a foothold in the first place. | ||||||||
| ▲ | saulpw 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Okay, and? Just because they'll find some other place to put it with worse terms, doesn't mean you should let them have it in their preferred location with bad terms. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | darig 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
[dead] | ||||||||