Ok. The original commenter said:

> "Many of these cameras are in private spaces"

To which the gp answered

> It's not private if it has a ip cam in it

So what? Either he meant to contradict the op (and then it's correct to push back), or this is an entirely superfluous comment given they both understand what the problem is.

A space can be considered private by the occupant, but the addition of an IP camera makes it not private.

They are not contradictory statements.

It’s not superfluous. It’s saying “it’s unsafe to assume any space is private.”