| ▲ | A Perfect Meritocracy Will Have Limited Social Mobility(outlookzen.com) | |||||||
| 5 points by whack 13 hours ago | 3 comments | ||||||||
| ▲ | FrankWilhoit 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The difference between meritocracy and "meritocracy" is that the former is a training function, whose goal is to learn the set of contributors whose contributions can be ignored. In "meritocracy", on the other hand, that set is the initial premise and the purpose of every production is to justify it post-facto. Obviously the distinction between these two things is essential. Now think about the perspectives from which the distinction is imperceptible. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rekabis 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
In a perfect meritocracy, those who are best skilled will rise to the top. And many skills do not depend on nature or nurture. Just look at the IT industry. For decades some of the best and brightest came up through the ranks with zero formal training, just a thirst for knowledge, a passion for the subject, and (in many cases) an autistic drive for order and perfection. It’s only been in the last decade or so where degrees have started to increase in importance, and for many job applications they’re just a Nice To Have. | ||||||||
| ||||||||