Remix.run Logo
energy123 9 hours ago

You assumed wrong. Maybe listen to the interviews before responding with aggressive sarcasm.

kadoban 9 hours ago | parent [-]

It was an honest question.

energy123 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I would point you to Gen MacKenzie's interviews as the reference on that question, I would just be regurgitating his views.

He says that a sustained coastal invasion is not necessary. Raids would be necessary to destroy any buried weapons, but these troops wouldn't need to stay there.

Other than this you need more of what they were already doing, "shaping operations" as he calls it, which is ISR drones overhead and lots of bombing/strafing runs.

Eventually, because they don't have a remaining industrial base and cannot effectively replenish their stocks (excepting more simple one way attack drones), they will lack the ability to project enough power beyond their borders to keep the strait closed.

Operation Praying Mantis is a somewhat dated case study, but still required reading.

The reason it's so expensive should be more intuitively obvious - interceptors are expensive and are needed to pace China, and a few more months of closure is significant inflation before the midterms.

kadoban 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Thanks for the info, I'll track down that interview. That is an interesting strategy that I didn't consider.

andriy_koval 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Raids would be necessary to destroy any buried weapons, but these troops wouldn't need to stay there.

Shaheds can be launched from trucks from inside densely populated cities. Good luck with those raids.

> Eventually, because they don't have an industrial base and cannot effectively replenish their stocks

Modern drones are cheap and easy to assemble, Iran's allies (Russia, China) can easily smuggle them inside country.

energy123 8 hours ago | parent [-]

The win condition is not zero Shahed attacks, the win condition is to open the strait.

andriy_koval 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Its the same thing. Businesses won't move ships if there are shahed attacks.

energy123 7 hours ago | parent [-]

And yet they are moving ships despite Shahed attacks that occurred yesterday, so by this empirical observation, you must conclude that you are operating under a flawed worldview.

andriy_koval 7 hours ago | parent [-]

yesterday's attack happened allegedly because Iran didn't allow specific ships to move. Those which are moving today likely received permission from Iran.

senordevnyc 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If the truth is that our extremely expensive military is relatively useless in this situation, do you really think he'd admit that?