For a CSS design site, this looks fairly bad to my eye. I'm not any kind of UX expert, it just looks clunky:

- Lots of text seems slightly offset. It's not all centered within buttons etc.

- The text also doesn't seem to quite line up with the icon on said buttons (it feels relatively a little too high)

- Similarly the text within the little notification popups ("New") isn't centered and hits the top of the outline

- The colours have poor contrast. I don't have any vision impairment but the peach colour doesn't feel distinct enough from the purple/lavender to me. (It's better in light mode when the peach turns to a stronger red).

- On that note, maybe yellow was not the best background for the beer badge when most of the glass is yellow with a bit of white.

I don't know if there's something that makes this render any differently for me than anyone else. I'm using Chrome though so I wouldn't have thought it'd be especially unusual.

▲

stephbook 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's what I love about iPhone13 mini with Safari. You spot badly designed sites immediately.

(This site's buttons are too wide and it bumps from left to right when scrolling sideways.)

It's still a free CSS kit, but now I know there's no care behind it.

	▲	nine_k an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I remember how IE5 used to be the bottom rung to test a design against. (The site renders perfectly for me in Firefox on Linux. I never owned an iPhone. I suppose whatever AI model was working on it also used a single desktop browser.)

▲

zahlman 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I only see a blank white page.

I'd expect that people who are specifically trying to show me an interesting CSS library could make at least something show up on the page without JavaScript.

As a matter of policy, I don't whitelist sites that give me neither a clear reason nor initial content.

▲

CamouflagedKiwi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Right, so it's some JS SPA thing as well (of course).

Out of interest, do you not often find this a problem these days? I feel like there'd be a lot of sites out there that are non-functional or literally do nothing without JS.

	▲	chrismorgan 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It does still happen not infrequently on a certain sort of site which I’ll simplify to “marketing homepage”, but it’s not happening anywhere near as often as it did three years ago. I haven’t tried to assess if this is because more-sensible frameworks have gained popularity, or if the stupid frameworks support server-side rendering better now. Gotta say, though, that I don’t think one actually misses much in such cases. Of sites that require JS to not be blank and don’t fit into this main category, my vague feeling is that the rate hasn’t changed much.
	▲	Silhouette 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Maybe it's triggering ad blockers? I have JS enabled and I see a few elements but it's obviously broken here too. In any case it's not a great look if they want to encourage adoption of their tools!

▲

lacoolj 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

100% agree i wish i could upvote this comment twice

▲

troupo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> For a CSS design site, this looks fairly bad to my eye. I'm not any kind of UX expert, it just looks clunky:

Front page says "Build material design in record time", so it's on par with actual Material Design which is all that, and more. Here's a small thread I collected some time back: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1643607965935476737.html