The CCP's approach has historically been to subsidize their companies far more than other countries do. Why would LLMs be any different?

https://www.oecd.org/en/data/dashboards/magic-database-indus...

▲

declan_roberts 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Access to everything every American company feeds into the AI is well worth it to the CCP.

▲

eagleal 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even the latest World Bank report, the defacto neoliberal institution, recognized a couple of months ago that leaving the industries focus be dictaed by purely capital decisions was bad, as in _really_ bad.

▲

u8080 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

According to EU statistics, yeah

	▲	dgellow 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		OECD isn’t the EU. And regarding the dataset: > Unlike most OECD databases, which rely on government data provided at country-level, the OECD MAGIC database uses firm-level data. The subsidy estimates included in the database are based on raw data obtained from firms’ annual reports, financial statements, bond prospectuses, IPO prospectuses, etc. The data are collected and verified manually by the OECD to maximise accuracy, consistency, and comparability. In some cases, additional information is also obtained from government databases, either to verify the firm-level information or to complement it. Care is taken to avoid double-counting where the data mix corporate and government sources.

▲

nixon_why69 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Does that figure hold up when we look at Silicon Valley financing? Uber alone was subsidized to the tune of billions. Let alone the recent batch where we're into hundreds of billions.