The Chevron doctrine gave more power to the executive agencies of the current administration, so I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.

▲

preg_match 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That repealing the chevron doctrine was a calculated play in the unitary executive theory. We all know congress is basically useless these days. But we also know that regulation isn’t, like, optional. It’s going to happen no matter what.

So what’s left? Where does that decision making go? Turns out the executive, so that’s what we’ve been seeing and it’s largely uncontested. This should have been obvious to most people going into this, particularly if they understood Trumps platform or Project 2025.

▲

twoodfin an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Repeal of the Chevron doctrine took the power of deference away from executive agencies and replaced it with first-principles judicial interpretation of statutes.

Chevron and the unitary executive theory have essentially nothing to do with each other.

I’m still not sure what point is attempting to be made here.

	▲	preg_match 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		In effect, it did not. All it said is that the powers enumerated to those executive agencies must be more explicitly laid out by congress. But, that’s just not something that’s going to happen. So, the gap has been filled largely by executive orders.

▲

calvinmorrison an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

perhaps congress could do something other than vacation

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]