| ▲ | anticorporate 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There's also, importantly, a distinction between what are told we can no longer use, and what can actually be taken away. Open source and open hardware can be called illegal by a government, but, if we collectively invest our energy into open alternatives, they can't be taken away in the same sense. I can build a RepRap printer and I can use a local AI model. It's on all of us to make sure that the open alternatives are viable, maybe in the current global political reality now more than ever. Making something illegal isn't a disincentive for everyone. When they start banning books, some of us start assembling printing presses. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | echoangle 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Believe me, if the government wants to stop you from having access to something like that, they could do it. Just give people some incentive to report you and make really harsh punishments and everyone will be thinking really hard about how bad they want have access. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||