| ▲ | sajithdilshan 3 hours ago |
| That’s assuming China would not start controlling the access to their models. |
|
| ▲ | throwa356262 an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Chinese companies can make a killing selling on prem AI systems to the rest of the world now. Big boxes with Huawei GPUs and Chinese open models to run inside your company without network access. |
| |
| ▲ | sajithdilshan an hour ago | parent [-] | | They could, but I can imagine if US keeps on blocking the cutting edge models, China would never ship the cutting edge models and would still make a killing shipping models that are powerful enough for most of business cases | | |
| ▲ | throwa356262 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Serious question: why not? Because China doesn't have the hardware to do this? Or the brains? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hgoel 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| China has no reason to do that. The US is freely handing them the international market for AI. |
| |
| ▲ | sajithdilshan an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Are they though? I see this as a precautious method by US to maintain AI model superiority so the Chinese companies cannot distill from the US frontier models. Let's see how fast Chinese models would improve without access to latest US models and if they keep on releasing open models | | |
| ▲ | Daishiman 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > Let's see how fast Chinese models would improve without access to latest US models and if they keep on releasing open models Chinese tech has been on an exponential growth trajectory. If they see the need for AI superiority then there's really no moat for AI companies. |
| |
| ▲ | frollogaston an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | US just needs their internationally usable model to be better than China's. If China catches up, US starts releasing more powerful models. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [deleted] |
