Remix.run Logo
munificent 7 hours ago

> The keyboard gave everyone a "bicycle of the mind", now everyone can visually express themselves if they try.

Right, everyone can. So now your film-making vision is simply one infinitesimally small slice of the pie that every viewer is eating. Yes, you can make a movie by yourself. Likely no one will watch it because they're too busy watching other movies made just as cheaply but by companies with marketing budgets.

> I am getting so much more work done that I'm launching easily three times what I did prior to AI tooling.

Great. Have you ever once in your life had a real conversation with a normal person where they expressed, "Man, you know what? I wish I had way more apps on my phone."

Like, yes, there is demand for software that fills unique niches, but really we are reaching saturation.

> When we have at-home Michelin star robot chefs

Eating the world's best meal, alone, while staring at your phone.

> where our cars can drive us to the beach overnight so we wake up to sunrise on the coast

This part sounds nice. Hopefully you can find parking.

> where I can have an idea for a new take on a music player tagging algorithm and just build that without it consuming weeks of my time.

Except you don't have a music player to put that algorithm in because all of the music players are closed source. You can write an open source one (or contribute to an existing one), but those all require local libraries of music, which almost no one has. Because it's not about the software, it's about the access to content.

But, really, why even bother tagging music in the first place? Just treat the tags as prompts and generate an infinite stream of music catered exactly to your mood, on demand.

I get where you're coming from. AI is a massive force multiplier for producing content. But content isn't the point of life.

The future that AI builds is one of perfect solitary meaningless hedonism. Every itch scratched, every base desire satisfied. But there is a hollow void at the center of that. Even a pet dog will lose its mind when given endless food, treats, and toys if it doesn't have an actual person to play with, and I'd like to believe we are somewhat more cognitively sophisticated than dogs.

Think back on the best meals you've ever had. I've had some very good ones. Some were memorable because of the quality of the food. But the memories of meals I hold most dear were dinners I made myself for family, not-very-good cookies my young daughter baked for me, meals shared with friends while travelling, crappy hot dogs cooked over a campfire.

It's human connection that brings us the most lasting joy, and AI is antithetical to it.

simonw 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Hopefully you can find parking.

One of the supposed benefits of true self driving cars is that you never have to find parking near where you're going ever again. Get out, send your car off to park somewhere 5 miles away.

spongebobstoes 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

discovery has always been the problem with art. many people are instrinsically motivated to create, that's why we have so much art

AI is orthogonal to human connection. people like people

munificent 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> AI is orthogonal to human connection.

No two things are truly orthogonal when you have to spend time to use either of them. An hour conversing with ChatGPT is an hour of your life unavailable for talking to a human.

Timon3 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And now discovery is becoming exponentially harder, because every niche can get flooded with AI slop by companies trying to extract profits from real people's creativity.

Even if you use these tools to create something amazing, what keeps hundreds of variations "inspired by, but totally not copied" of your creative work from popping up? As these models get cheaper and more powerful, this issue will only get worse and worse.

spongebobstoes 6 hours ago | parent [-]

this is the same argument against the printing press, photography, home printers, youtube, etc

it is a bad argument. more accessible tools consistently lead to more creation in a positive way

Timon3 4 hours ago | parent [-]

There is a fundamental difference between those technologies and generative AI. I ask again: what stops companies from creating literally dozens, hundreds or thousands of copies of any creative work you publish? Why shouldn't they create AI artists that copy small artists in a "legally distinct" manner, and at a volume that drowns them out?

As these models get better and better, the only limiting factor is the available compute. Meanwhile data centers are being built like there's no tomorrow.