Again, if you think we the people are getting access to AGI you're a fool.

These models aren't even that smart and they are already trying to control them and lock them down to a handful of people.

Then these executive and VC wonder why people hate AI and are against them.

Because the future is heading toward intelligence for the rich and you stuck with whatever model they want you to have.

The next step is banning open source models.

The future is not looking so bright if these models are already going locked down to whoever the government what's to have them.

This is no different than the government banning books because they don't want you to learn.

▲

CMay 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It's different, because most books don't contain the nuclear codes or have real impacts on national security.

The way I see so many comments on the internet hating any sort of AI regulation, is young juveniles cursing at the installation of stoplights as they rev their engines. The world is bigger than just you, and not only you matter. Reasons exist for doing things.

	▲	impulser_ 16 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		So you okay with the government banning open source models, and making a list of who can have access to intelligence based on who they like? That just doesn't seem like a world I want to live in. I prefer a world where everyone has the same access to the same intelligence. Go back to the beginning of the internet, you would be for limiting the internet access to those the government likes? I was around in the early days of the internet when Google dorking was a thing, you could prompt Google and find exploits into hundreds and thousands of websites, servers, ect including government website. This isn't about national security, it about power and controlling it.