but this means you work with API pricing rather than subscription pricing. Isn’t it better to use claude or codex CLI etc directly in terms of cost?

▲

adchurch 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If you have a Claude/Codex subscription then we use that (and account for the subsidized price accordingly when making routing decisions) instead of API billing. So you get the best of both worlds: subsidized usage for frontier models + save by using open/smaller models when it's genuinely better.

In practice, lots of ppl are using this to make their Claude sub limits go further!

▲

emilio_srg2 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I see but didn’t they severely limited the usage allowed with `claude -p`

	▲	adchurch an hour ago \| parent [-]
		But we're not routing via `claude -p`, if you have sub usage available + it's the right choice to route to a Claude model, then the router is approximately a transparent passthrough. So it gets billed like normal `claude` usage rather than `claude -p`.