> The onus is on you to prove the claim that AI is equivalent or better.

I never claimed it.

But if we play along, and if I claim AI is equivalent, then once again ... why ask about glut of food and consumer products only a few years in, when that wasn't the case with the Industrial Revolution?

> But if you're not a troll, from the very fucking start of it there was a boom of products.

It began in 1760 in England. Can you compare 1764 with 1760 and itemize this "boom" you speak of?

The changes the Industrial Revolution brought about was slow - it took several decades. Correspondingly, the change in labor took that long as well.