I think they just don't care that the people are mad. The equation doesn't include workers. It actively excludes them.

Because no sane person would pitch a product that would put you out of work, it seems surprising to us to hear that pitch. But the pitch isn't to us; we're not part of the equation. We're passive listeners between uncaring, unfeeling parties who only value one thing, and that thing ain't us.

> The anger against AI/Tech is just starting really.

That seems like a pretty safe bet at this point.

▲

malfist 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Aside from one health insurance company CEO, why should they care that the common people are angry with them? It doesn't stop them from doing whatever the hell they want. Even if it's illegal (looking at you memphis data center gas generators)

	▲	mschuster91 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Aside from one health insurance company CEO, why should they care that the common people are angry with them? Because the frustration builds up. Either we'll see a few more CEOs facing street justice, or we will see candidates getting elected in the primaries that make Sanders and Mamdani combined look like burgeoise (aka, people will actually elect legitimate full on socialists or communists) - and the latter is the actually more dangerous scenario for the ultra rich.