| ▲ | nickcw 5 hours ago | |
That is very very funny, and oh so plausible. I enjoyed this bit a lot from the timeline > Karen Oyelaran finds the payload by reading the source code with her eyes and files a second issue. The triage assistant closes it as “duplicate of #8814.” Issue #8814 is a feature request for dark mode. Karen reopens it. The assistant closes it. Karen reopens it. Karen’s GitHub account is rate-limited for “patterns consistent with automated behaviour.” And this - the final sentence is a perfect indictment of the timeline we are in. > Two AI review agents from competing vendors, both attached to a downstream pull request bumping foxhole-lz4, enter a disagreement loop over whether the package is malicious. After 340 comments and $41,255 in inference spend, Finance revokes both API keys; one vendor’s marketing team, cc’d on the cost anomaly alert, issues a press release citing “a 430% YoY increase in adversarial multi-agent security reasoning.” The stock opens up 6%. I'm joining the goat farming waitlist ;-) | ||
| ▲ | pkoiralap 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Justice to Karen > We would like to thank: > > Karen Oyelaran, who found the issue on Day 1 and is currently appealing her GitHub rate limit via a web form that is also AI-triaged | ||
| ▲ | quijoteuniv 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It was funnier when i ask Ai what this was. The ai told me it was a satire about Ai, then i got it, funny. | ||