No he did not. He got the sentence for hiding evidence. The article tries very hard to push an agenda.

Hiding evidence is the normal manner of conducting business for a lot of company managers.

Therefore the sentence seems unusually harsh in comparison with the lenience in other equivalent cases.

	▲	AnimalMuppet 10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Hiding evidence of terrorism is something that I hope not many company managers do.
	▲	Hendrikto 17 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It does indeed seem like a harsh sentence. Something the article could focus on, instead of being disingenuous.