There's a famous poem called "First They Came" about how slippery this slope can be in a heated political climate.

I don't believe for a second this ends with "foreigners", this is about setting up infrastructure for controlling the technology. Foreigners are just the current excuse.

Note that TFA mentions they are supposedly hand-picking access to whoever they want, based on whatever criteria they want, already.

▲

15155 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah, invoking Godwin. "First they came" in 1976 when ITAR was first passed, or maybe "first they came" in the 1940s when we didn't export Proximity Fuzes, right?

Countries are free to prevent exports of technology. Equating export controls with the Holocaust is disgusting.

▲

avaer 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I did not bring in Godwin, but I guess he's here now :D.

I'm more trying to invoke GRRM. This is a Game of Thrones: billionaire CEO's complain about each other to the government to get their competitors blocked/tripped up with acts of fiat, which is what happened with Fable 5.

And in the linked post, it says GPT-5.6 access decisions are supposedly just hand picked.

The stories about export controls are just songs they sing to the peasants.

There are claims that Chinese companies are mining + reselling Claude subscriptions like crazy anyway.

▲

15155 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> I did not bring in Godwin

Who is the "They" in "First They Came" referring to exactly?

> There are claims that Chinese companies are mining + reselling Claude subscriptions like crazy anyway.

Which will become a felony with export-controlled models, which is why identity verification is becoming a thing.

▲

hhjinks 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Nobody was compared to the nazis, so Godwin's law is not yet relevant in this discussion.

	▲	15155 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm sure cooky old Martin Niemöller just dreamt that poem up out of nowhere and his time spent in in Dachau had nothing to do with it.