A data race that doesn't compile

cptroot 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I know this is a small point, but you likely mean "race condition" here. Rust already guarantees safe code to be free of "data races", and this blog post doesn't discuss unsafe in any way.

Two other points that came up while I was reading:

1. I get that this is something you did once for an internal project, but this is what macros and derive_macros are made for.

2. The AI that you used to help write the post left its mark a little too deep. The cliched phrases make an appearance at the start of every section and it really starts to grate by the end.

	▲	infinitebit 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		“The second condition falls out of the first”. Hi claude!

▲

asdf88990 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

AI written article. I hate how I can quickly pick this up these days and I hate how I see it everywhere recently.

If you don’t have time to write, I don’t have time to read it.

	▲	bschwindHN 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		No kidding, it drives me crazy. The tone is always so authoritative and dramatic, like every fact is a mic drop moment. I need to get back to writing some of my own articles I've been meaning to write, as a palate cleanser.
	▲	TonyAlicea10 10 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I stopped reading at "Here’s the observation that started everything:".

▲

ydj 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Surely you can express this in C++ just as you could in rust…

▲

nynx 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don’t think this needed to be parallelized.

▲

valentynkit 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]